Best Online CAT Coaching

Option A is negated because the major concern was Kale’s inability to work competently in a team and not his conflicting responsibilities at home and office. Kale was facing personal problems at home and option B states that employees’ problems at home affect their performance at work. This strengthens the argument rather than weakening it by citing one more reason to sack Kale. Option D is incorrect because if it holds true than it wipes out the possibility of sending Kale to some other location for work and does leave the management with the only option of sacking him. Option E is eliminated because it again strengthens the argument as the caselet clearly says that Kale was emotionally unstable. Option C is the correct choice as the report in the journal indicates that most managers find it difficult to work in a group. Even if Kale is sacked and a new manager is hired in his place, it is likely that the new manager may face the same problem (of not being able to work in a group). And hence it will not be a good business decision to sack Kale. Therefore,
option C weakens the argument and is the correct answer.